
The balance of power within the Fundación Puertos de Las Palmas hides a deep financial asymmetry. The latest financial statements of the port institution reviewed by Canarymaritime highlight an operational model that critically depends on its office leases. The control of expenditure and the allocation of public funds in the Canary port facility have generated recurring friction between administrations. The insular corporation maintains a strictly supervisory stance towards the economic management carried out by the Port Authority of Las Palmas. This scrutiny coincides with an undeniable accounting reality: public money sustains the building.
The Cabildo of Gran Canaria adopts a dual position that combines political mandate with the leadership of real estate expenditure. The insular institution actively participates in the board of directors of the Fundación. In parallel, it is the client that provides the largest cash flow through the use of its facilities. The Cabildo instrumentalizes this relationship through the Sociedad de Promoción Económica de Gran Canaria (SPEGC), a company entirely funded by public capital. The SPEGC pays 79,568.16 euros strictly for leasing space and services at the port headquarters. It also has a representative on the board of directors of the Fundación Puertos de Las Palmas, Cosme García.
The contribution of the Cabildo’s subsidiary surpasses that of any private logistics operator or multinational. The breakdown of other income from activities allows for an assessment of the weight of each tenant in the viability of the property. The outsourcing services giant Konecta ranks as the second largest tenant by billing volume with a payment of 76,865.40 euros. The multinational shipping company of French origin Containership CMA CGM SAU occupies third place after paying 46,431.00 euros. The list of commercial occupants under contract concludes with Artra Servicios S.L. (now Baleària), which transferred 21,445.80 euros, and the restaurant establishment La Posada de Jamaica S.L., which accounts for an expense of 19,030.95 euros.
And Fedeport?
The sum of these five commercial rents generated a direct operational flow of 243,341.31 euros for the organization’s treasury. This volume of business contrasts with the inactivity of traditional income streams for non-profit entities. The official audit of the Fundación Puertos de Las Palmas certifies zero revenue from member fees or contributions. The accounting document likewise specifies the total absence of direct contributions from users of its own activities. The survival of the physical structure of the entity depends on the rents of its offices and the fixed contributions from its patrons.
The Canary Federation of Port Companies (Fedeport) operates at the core of this financial contradiction. The maritime employer uses the facilities of the Fundación Puertos de Las Palmas building for its daily activities and corporate representation. The detailed economic records of the property do not reflect any invoice, fee, or income from rent related to the federation’s initials. The use of space by the employer does not generate any direct computable real estate compensation in the lease category.
The political weight of the employer in decision-making contradicts its absence in the tenants’ balance sheet. Fedeport has double representation on the board of directors of the Fundación. The president of the federation, José Juan Socas, occupies a seat on the executive body. The manager of the employer, Elba Bueno, shares the same executive status in the entity’s meetings. Bueno formalizes her presence on the board under the legal representation of Astilleros Canarios (Astican), a corporation integrated into the Greek capital shipping group Laskaridis.
The link between Astican and the Fundación Puertos de Las Palmas is articulated through the block of permanent business collaborators. This group of private corporations injected a joint sum of 170,000 euros into the institution’s accounts during the audited year. The funds come from ten of the main brands within the industrial fabric of Puerto de la Luz. The capital is contributed by companies such as Hamilton y Cía (Transcoma), Clínica Perpetuo Socorro, Boluda Corporación Marítima, Oryx Iberia, Cementos Especiales de las Islas, Zamakona, the <strong_Port Employment Center to package the stevedores' lobby, Fedeport, and Petróleos de Canarias S.A., in addition to the aforementioned Astican. This financing model perpetuates a system where the Cabildo assumes the highest real estate burdens through the SPEGC while the port employer manages the entity sharing its offices at no direct cost for the land.







